References >> Pathogen Detection
Pathogen DetectionIntroduction to Pathogen Detection |
Related Reference Link: Bacterial Identification |
Advances in DNA sequencing technology have made it possible for scientists all over the world to sequence complete microbial genomes rapidly and efficiently. Access to the DNA sequences of entire microbial genomes offers new opportunities to analyze and understand microorganism at the molecular level. Scientists are able to detect pathogens in biological tissues and study variations in gene expression in response to the pathogenic invasion. These responses help in designing novel approaches for microbial pathogen detection and drug development. Identification of certain microbial pathogens as etiologic agents responsible for chronic diseases is leading to new treatments and prevention strategies for these diseases.
Each species of pathogens carries with it a unique DNA or RNA signature that differentiate it from other organisms. One of the challenges is to develop this DNA signature for each microorganism of interest for rapid and specific detection.
Pathogen detection has become an important
part of research in many fields like:
# Biodefense
# Animal health care
# Food safety
# Diagnostics
# Pathology
# Clinical research
# Forensics
# Drug discovery
For biodefense, accurate analytical
techniques for discovering pathogenic
agents are needed. Animal health care
community uses pathogen detection to
develop various diagnostic tests that
are rapid, reliable and highly sensitive
for effective control and treatment
of diseases of animals. In diagnostics,
the technique is employed to detect
or identify infectious agents, toxins,
parasites, metabolic disorders, and
genetic susceptibility/resistance.
The predominant techniques currently used to identify microbial pathogens rely upon conventional clinical microbiology monitoring approaches that are well established suffer from a number of considerable drawbacks. Standard culture and susceptibility tests permit pathogen identification but is laborious, time-consuming, expensive and require labile natural products. More importantly, the tests that are routinely utilized for pathogen identification do not directly characterize virulence factors. Thus, these tests do not provide the needed information about the potential pathogenicity or virulence of the identified organisms. Conventional techniques also do not lend themselves well to managing large numbers of environmental or clinical samples. To quickly determine the presence of pathogen, researchers need reliable and accurate tools which can cater to the increasing need of finding faster, accurate analytical techniques for discovering agents.
There are nearly as many approaches to rapidly detecting pathogens and diagnosing disease as there are companies and laboratories developing the technologies.
Efforts to overcome
problems like culturing of microorganisms,
false positives and causative agent
in pathogen detection have led to the
development of DNA-based diagnostic
methods such as polymerase chain reaction
(PCR) amplification techniques. The
use of DNA-based methods derives from
the premise that each species of pathogen
carries unique DNA or RNA signature
that differentiates it from other organisms.
Among the various PCR strategies available,
those based on monitoring the amplification
reaction in real time are probably the
most promising and are increasingly
used for rapid, sensitive, and specific
detection of microbes.
The ideal solution for a real-time detector
is a biological organism specific response
that results in almost instantaneous,
specific and repeatable identification.
However, there are considerable technological
and practical difficulties in the development
of sensors that provide a real-time
response for all three of these criteria.
Immuno-assay techniques also give a
similar specific analysis. However,
an additional drawback other than the
long response time, is the requirement
for special chemical consumables that
add considerably to the logistic burden
and costs. These can increase operational
costs by hundreds of dollars per hour.
Optical technologies intrinsically result
in real-time bio-detection and devices
based on these technologies have been
available to military and civil defense
organizations for a number of years.
However, the common drawback of this
type of sensor is the lack of specificity.
The sensors mostly offer a generic detection
capability at best, since the optical
similarity of the target particles with
benign, naturally occurring backgrounds
makes them difficult to distinguish.
There are the some of the currently
employed bio-agent detections strategies.
Most represent a compromise between
specificity, speed and cost.
Biotechnology offers the most specific detection approach. Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) technique is capable of amplification and detection of a DNA sample from a single bio-agent cell within 30 minutes. Knowing the pathogen nucleic acid sequence enables scientists to construct oligos to detect the pathogen. These oligos are at the basis of many highly specific analytical tests now on the market.
The advantage of microarray-based
detection is that it can combine powerful
nucleic acid amplification strategies
with the massive screening capability
of microarray technology, resulting
in a high level of sensitivity, specificity,
and throughput. In addition to the previously
mentioned caveats, the cost and organizational
complexity of performing a large number
of PCR reactions for downstream microarray
applications render this option feasible
but unattractive. This limitation has
severely reduced the utility of this
technique and impeded the continued
development of downstream applications.
Researchers are often unsure of the
validity of the microarray data and
the often asked question is: Must you validate the data using
an alternate technique?
The answer is a resounding 'Yes'. Simply because it will make the researcher
feel more confident of the results,
and more importantly the reviewers is
sure to ask for it.
An excellent design software tool is
crucial for success in assay development
efforts. AlleleID®, a new software tool,
can play a vital role in easing the
experimental burden and minimizing assay
development as well as operational costs.
AlleleID® is a pioneering software specially
designed for meeting the challenges
of pathogen detection, bacterial identification,
species identification and taxa discrimination
assay development. Its unique feature
"Minimal Set"
minimizes the number of probes required
to identify a group of sequences. AlleleID®
starts by aligning sequences using the
popular ClustalW algorithm, analyzes
conserved and species specific regions
and then designs primers and probes
to amplify and detect only the species
of interest from the mix.